Pages

Employee Free Choice Act, employers (union and non-union) must be prepared

The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), also known as the “Card Check bill” has been the top priority of unions throughout this election year. If passed, the EFCA will amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by removing previous barriers to union organizing.

President elect Barack Obama was a co-sponsor of the bill while a senator and has said that he will sign it into law if the legislation comes across his desk.

If Obama signs the EFCA, it would result in the most “sweeping” changes to the NLRA in the past 40 years. Union and non-union employers must be prepared for this law, which will make it easier for workplaces to unionize and will likely lead to a spike in union organizing activity, according to Mark Mathiason of the Gray Plant Mooty law firm.

In a recent Human Resources Executive Online article, Garry Mathiason, partner and vice chair of Littler Mendelson in San Francisco, advised:

The 2009 agenda for HR professionals must assume EFCA in some form will become law. In anticipation, employers should consider auditing conditions to determine whether they would support an organizing drive; monitoring union-organizing activities within the industry or geographical location; training management about rules associated with union organizing, potentially providing employees with information and arguments about union representation when organizing activity is anticipated and -- in some highly targeted industries -- even before receiving evidence of organizing activity; and, most of all, reviewing overall employment conditions to ensure they are competitive and the needs of employees are being addressed.


The EFCA would amend the NLRA in three major areas:

  1. The EFCA would require the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to recognize a labor union through authorization cards signed by a majority of employees, without the benefit of a government-supervised, secret-ballot election.
  2. It would also require arbitration if an employer and a newly certified union are unable to reach an agreement on an initial contract in a timely fashion.
  3. The new law would create significant penalties for remedying employer unfair labor practices. Such penalties would apply during any period when unions are organizing and during negotiations of a first contract.

The G.Neil labor law team will continue to watch the EFCA as President elect Obama prepares to take office in January. Check back regularly for the most up-to-date information to help your business take action and stay in compliance.
Share/Bookmark

Benefits of hiring older workers

Whether it's from devastated 401(k) accounts, the rising cost of living or uncertainty about the future, more older workers are delaying retirement and some are even leaving retirement for a spot back in the workforce.

More than one-quarter (27 percent) of workers 45 and older were postponing retirement and two-thirds reported having more difficulty paying for essentials such as food, gas and medicine, according to a recent AARP survey.

Additionally, the number of older workers on full-time schedules nearly doubled from 1995 to 2007 and those working part-time increased 19 percent.

Human resources faces unique challenges as more older workers reenter the workplace -- communication across generations, teamwork between coworkers with different work styles, training managers how to work with employees who are much older or younger than they may be.

Still yet, the benefits of hiring older workers greatly outweigh the challenges. Older workers posses the workplace skills businesses need to succeed in today's economy, including:

  • Experience. This group of workers understands how business works and what needs to be done in order to succeed, because they've lived it. Depending on the nature of the job, companies will save time and money on less training.
  • Work ethic. Older workers in the workplace are more dependable and stay more task-focused than their younger counterparts. They are less distracted by cell phones, mp3 players and social networks, and concerned more with completing the task at hand. Older employees have also proven to be the most self-motivated in the workplace.
  • Loyalty. These days, a young worker may have gone through three jobs by the time they turn 25, but that's not the case with senior employees. Older workers grew up during a time where people worked for only one or two companies during their lifetime, building a strong sense of loyalty.
  • Pride. Senior employees take personal pride in a job well done. While younger workers may be more concerned with making it out of the office in time to meet friends, older workers are more likely to stick around past closing time to make sure the job is finished and the final product reflects quality work.
  • Confidence. With all of their experience and training, older workers have a sense of confidence that younger workers still have yet to develop. Their confidence allows them to make decisions and share ideas that can help companies find ways to save money and run more efficiently.

Hiring older workers, with their unique skills and work styles, has the potential to improve productivity and save companies money during a time when it is needed the most. Tapping into the benefits of a mature workforce can help many businesses through these tough times and into a brighter future.
Share/Bookmark

New FMLA regulations, what employers need to know

The U.S. Department of Labor released the final regulations under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), clarifying employer and employee rights under the law. The new FMLA regulations were published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2008 and will take effect on January 16, 2009. New forms and posters reflecting the latest changes will be required for employers subject to the FMLA.

This is the first set of revisions to the FMLA regulations since its enactment in 1993 and will affect all employers that must adhere to FMLA guidelines. The final rule helps workers and employers better understand their responsibilities and will speed the implementation of a new law that expands FMLA coverage for military families.

"This final rule, for the first time, gives America's military families special job-protected leave rights to care for brave service men and women who are wounded or injured, and also helps families of members of the National Guard and Reserves manage their affairs when their service member is called up for active duty," said U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao in a recent press release. "At the same time, the final rule provides needed clarity about general FMLA rights and obligations for both workers and employers."

The final rule includes two notable benefits for some military families:

Military Caregiver Leave: Expands FMLA protections for family members caring for a covered service member with a serious injury or illness incurred in the line of duty on active duty. These family members are able to take up to 26 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period.

Leave for Qualifying Exigencies for Families of National Guard and Reserves: The law allows families of National Guard and Reserve personnel on active duty to take FMLA job-protected leave to manage their affairs — "qualifying exigencies." The rule defines "qualifying exigencies" as: (1) short-notice deployment (2) military events and related activities (3) childcare and school activities (4) financial and legal arrangements (5) counseling (6) rest and recuperation (7) post-deployment activities and (8) additional activities where the employer and employee agree to the leave.


Additional highlights from the new FMLA regulations:

Waiver of Rights: The department has finalized its position that employees may voluntarily settle their FMLA claims without court or departmental approval. However, prospective waivers of FMLA rights will continue to be prohibited.

Serious Health Condition: The new rule clarifies that if an employee is taking leave involving more than three consecutive calendar days of incapacity plus two visits to a health care provider, the two visits must occur within 30 days of the period of incapacity. Additionally, it defines "periodic visits to a health care provider" for chronic serious health conditions as at least two visits per year.

Light Duty: Time spent in "light duty" work does not count against an employee's FMLA leave entitlement, and the employee retains the right to job restoration during the light duty period.

Employer Notice Obligations: The final rule clarifies and strengthens the employer notice requirements to employees in order that employers will better inform employees about their FMLA rights and obligations, and allow for a smoother exchange of information between employers and employees.

Employee Notice: Under the new regulations, employees must follow their employer’s normal call-in procedures when taking FMLA leave. Under current rules, employees may notify their employer up to two days after an absence on their need for FMLA leave.

Medical Certification Process: The final rule recognizes the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and its impact on medical privacy. Responding to concerns about medical privacy, the new provisions prohibit direct supervisors from obtaining employee medical information for FMLA certification.


View the final rule as it appears in the Federal Register, here.

New forms and posters will be required for employers subject to FMLA guidelines. G.Neil’s top legal experts are working to provide you with the information and resources needed to stay in full FMLA compliance.

As of today, our legal team is developing a new E-Guide to explain the new FMLA rules in plain English. Check back regularly for the most up-to-date information to help you understand and take action on the latest legal requirements that affect your business.

Read our new Q & A reviewing the latest Family and Medical Leave Act Changes.
Share/Bookmark

Obama on labor law: Preparing for change

As President-elect Barack Obama prepares to take his place in the White House, businesses across the country are considering what impact his plans will have on their organizations in the coming years.

In our existing unpredictable market, businesses should be prepared for impending changes related to wages, immigration, taxes, health care, executive compensation and benefits, civil rights and an inevitable increase in worker unionization, according to Littler Mendelson, the nation’s largest employment and labor law firm representing management, in a recent article.

“The combination of President Obama, with an electoral mandate for change from the voters, large Democratic gains in both houses of Congress, and the declining economy, sets the stage for a wave of legislative and regulatory proposals intended to protect workers in these troubled times,” Jay Sumner, a Washington, DC-based attorney at Littler said. “In the first 100 days and over the next four years, American businesses should anticipate significant changes.

“Those companies that educate themselves and prepare to navigate the changed labor and employment landscape will survive and prosper, and they should have a competitive edge over those that are caught unprepared,” said Sumner in a recent Seacoastonline.com article.


Here are the most important employment law issues we’ll be watching after Obama takes office in 2009:

Unions - The Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), designed to make it easier for unions to organize, is the top item on the labor agenda. Obama has already pledged to sign EFCA into law once passed.

Health care - Experts predict that the Obama Administration will explore avenues to keep the current employer-provided health care system in place. Obama’s health care plan would require employers to provide health care benefits or pay a percentage of payroll to support public health care.

Immigration - The new administration will push to increase enforcement of immigration laws and hold negligent employers accountable for disregard of immigration laws and employing undocumented workers. Obama is likely to agree with past proposals requiring government contractors to use E-Verify and could extend the program if accuracy and funding issues are settled.

Minimum Wage - Obama has pledged to increase minimum wage and index it to inflation.

Time off - The Obama Administration wants to expand the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to cover smaller employers, those with 25 or more employees, and permit leave for more reasons. Obama and Congress are also considering paid FMLA leave, mandatory sick leave and flexible work arrangements.
Share/Bookmark

Help employees quit smoking, participate in the Great American Smokeout

November is Lung Cancer Awareness Month and Thursday, November 20, marks the 33rd Great American Smokeout, a day created to inspire and encourage smokers to quit for one day.

Almost 45% of the 45.3 million American smokers have attempted to quit smoking for at least one day in the past year, according to the American Cancer Society. For more than 30 years, the Great American Smokeout has proven to be a great opportunity to motivate smokers to make a long-term to quit for good.

Each year, only about 5% of smokers who quit succeed long-term and stress about the economy is having a clear and immediate effect on smokers, according to a recent survey sponsored by the American Legacy Foundation.

The survey found that smokers’ increased stress is causing smokers to delay a quit attempt, increase the number of cigarettes they are smoking, or switch to a cheaper brand instead of quitting. Additionally, former smokers reported that they are starting to smoke again because of financial stress.

Among the survey findings:

  • 77% of smokers report increased stress levels due to the current state of the economy, two-thirds of those smokers say this stress has had an effect on their smoking.
  • One in four smokers stressed about the economy say this stress has caused them to smoke more cigarettes per day, higher among women (31%) than men (17%).
  • A greater percentage of middle-income ($35-74.9k) stressed smokers have delayed their quit attempts because of stress over the economy (20%) than those with household incomes of under $35k (14%).


“The best time to quit smoking is now,” according to the American Cancer Society. Use the upcoming Great American Smokeout to start a smoking cessation program, revisit your workplace smoking policy and encourage employees who smoke to set November 20 as their quit date.

The American Cancer Society has put together a Smokeout page as part of their Great American Health Challenge full of materials to help publicize smoking cessation in your workplace, press releases, local resources and guides to help employees quit smoking.
Share/Bookmark

New FMLA rules coming to a workplace near you

New Family and Medical Leave Act regulations are expected to become official soon and could go into effect by the end of this month.

In late October, the Department of Labor (DOL) submitted a final draft of new FMLA regulations to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. The OMB has a final action date of November 2008, but no specific day.

The DOL released proposed FMLA rule changes in February and asked for public comment. It is still unknown what changes were made, if any, based on feedback from the public.

The proposed regulations suggested a dozen key changes, some of the most substantial changes include notice from employees, eligibility standards, the definition of “serious health condition” and the release of FMLA claims.

We’ll have more information once the final regulations are published. Subscribe or check back often for the latest updates.
Share/Bookmark

Workplace health: November is Flu Awareness Month

Influenza (commonly known as the flu) is a contagious respiratory illness that can cause mild to severe symptoms, and at times can lead to death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tens of thousands of Americans die every year from flu complications.

The best way to prevent the flu is by receiving a flu vaccination each fall. The Center has designated November as Flu Awareness Month to encourage all Americans to get the flu shot.

Every year in the United States, on average 5% to 20% of the population gets the flu; more than 200,000 people are hospitalized from flu complications, and; about 36,000 people die from flu. Some people, such as older people, young children, and people with certain health conditions, are at high risk for serious flu complications.

Ways to keep your workplace safe and employees healthy during flu season:

Host a flu clinic. Provide flu shots on company grounds as part of your employee wellness program. For information about hosting a flu clinic visit the American Lung Association’s Online Flu Clinic Locator.

Educate employees on the benefits of the flu shot. Distribute information that encourages employees to get the flu vaccination and debunk myths that you can get the flu from a flu shot (the vaccine does not contain live viruses). Hang posters around the office on the importance of prevention and the dangers of the flu.

Review sick leave/absence policies. Ensure your policy does not punish employees for being sick, because employees who feel they will be disciplined will be more inclined to come to work no matter how ill they may be.

Encourage employees to take preventative measures. Inform employees on the most effective ways they can work to stay healthy in the office. The most important prevention activity - washing hands with soap and water often. Make sure bathrooms are stocked with soap and paper towels and go one step further by providing hand sanitizers and tissues in common rooms.

If the flu makes its way into the office, proceed with caution. Minimize employees’ exposure to the flu by limiting face-to-face meetings, consider telecommuting and hold off on typical business greetings like handshakes for a period of time.


For more information on the 2008-2009 flu season visit the CDC website.
Share/Bookmark

Tracking attendance: Top reasons employees call in sick

An estimated 33% of employees have played hooky from the office at least once this year by calling in sick when they were well, according to CareerBuilder.com’s annual survey on absenteeism.

The majority of employers surveyed said they generally don’t question the reason for an employee’s absence. However, 31% have checked up on an employee who called in sick and 18% have gone as far as firing an employee for missing work without a legitimate excuse.

From the survey of more than 6.800 workers and 3,300 employers, CareerBuilder.com found the most common reasons for calling in sick, including:

  • 9% wanted to miss a meeting, buy some time to work on an overdue project or avoid the wrath of a boss or coworker
  • 30% needed to relax and recharge
  • 27% went to a doctor’s appointment
  • 22% needed to catch up on sleep
  • 14% wanted to run personal errands
  • 34% simply didn’t feel like going to work that day


Of the 31% of employers who checked up on an employee who called in sick:

  • 71% required the employee to show a doctor’s note
  • 56% called the employee at home
  • 18% had another worker call the employee
  • 17% drove by the employee’s home

"It’s in your best interest to be up-front with your employer and chances are you’ll get the time you need," said Rosemary Haefner, Vice President of Human Resources at CareerBuilder.com. "More companies today are moving toward a Paid Time Off system, giving employees more flexibility in how they categorize time away from the office. Employers are also expanding the definition of the sick day with 65 percent stating that they allow their team members to use sick days for mental health days."


Whether you require employees to have a legitimate excuse or not, tracking employee attendance can be one of the most burdensome and paperwork-filled tasks managers must deal with.

If you’re looking for a way to eliminate attendance paperwork and move to an electronic attendance tracking platform, we have a free webinar coming up that could offer a solution.

In our free, 30-minute “lunch and learn” presentation you’ll learn how unscheduled absenteeism affects your bottom line, the benefits of electronic recordkeeping and how software can help you get rid of employe attendance paperwork forever.

Software Basics: Track Attendance Electronically Like a Pro is sponsored by Gradience and created specifically for workplace software beginners interested in reducing unwanted paperwork and moving to a “greener” electronic solution.

Sign up today for Software Basics: Track Attendance Electronically Like a Pro on Wednesday, November 5, 2008 at 1 p.m., ET.

View upcoming webinars at G.Neil.com.
Share/Bookmark

Statistics show workplace injury and illness down

The rate of workplace injuries and illness in private industry in 2007 declined for the sixth consecutive year, according to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Nonfatal workplace injuries and illness in the private industry have declined 4.5 percent over the past year.

Over the past six years workplace injuries and illnesses have declined 21 percent. The shrinking statistic shows how effective targeted enforcement along with prevention methods, such as compliance assistance, have worked together to promote a culture focused on workplace safety, according to Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao in a press release.

"Today's injury and illness results demonstrate that OSHA's balanced approach to workplace safety encompassing education, training, information sharing, inspection, regulation and aggressive enforcement is achieving significant reductions in workplace injury and illness throughout the country.

This report shows that employees are now safer in the workplace than ever before. This success validates our efforts, and we are redoubling this commitment to make workplaces even safer," said Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Edwin G. Foulke Jr.

Key findings of the 2007 Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illness:

  • The total recordable case injury and illness incidence rate was highest among mid-size establishments (those employing between 50 and 249 workers) and lowest among small establishments (those employing fewer than 11 workers).
  • General medical and surgical hospitals (NAICS 6221) reported more injuries and illnesses than any other industry in 2007—more than 253,500 cases.
  • The total recordable case injury and illness incidence rates declined among 5 of the 19 private industry sectors—Agriculture, forestry, fishing & hunting; Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; and Health care and social assistance—in 2007 and remained statistically unchanged in the remaining 14 industry sectors.
  • Incidence rates and numbers of cases for injuries and illnesses combined declined significantly in 2007 for several case types: total recordable cases; cases with days away from work, job transfer or restriction; cases with days away from work; and cases with job transfer or restriction.
Read the full study at bls.gov.
Share/Bookmark

Employee voting rights: Time to review your policies

Now is the time for employers to review and update policies and procedures for giving employees time off to cast their ballots on November 4.

While there are no federal laws mandating businesses to give employees time off from work to vote, many states require it. By fully understanding the employee voting rights in your state, you will know the best way to handle the barrage of questions and requests coming your way in the next two weeks.

Most state voting laws require businesses to adhere to the following rules:

  • If voting polls are open for two or more hours before or after employees’ normal working hours, the employer is not required to give paid time off.
  • Employers have the right to ask for written request from employees for time off to vote.
  • Employers may designate a certain time when employees are permitted to take time off to vote.
  • Lunch periods may not be included as part of the time off designated for voting.
  • Employees may not be disciplined or retaliated against for taking time off to vote.

There is no rule prohibiting businesses from giving employees more flexibility or privileges that what the law mandates.

Since most state laws only refer to voting on Election Day, you may run into some confusion when employees ask for time off to vote early. The best practice would be to allow an employee to vote early in the same way you would allow them time off to vote on Election Day, according to John Phillips at The Word on Employment Law blog.

He gives two reasons for this best practice:

“Every state’s public policy is to encourage voting in elections. If you deny an employee’s request to take time off to vote (even if there’s a technical basis for doing this given the specific language in your state statute), you could violate your state’s public policy. And even if you don’t, you probably don’t want to become, particularly this year, the poster child for employers who make it difficult for their employees to vote. Voting is a hot button issue, and the media would likely give a lot of publicity to this kind of situation.”


Another good practice to consider following is to send a notice explaining your company’s voting day policy to employees through e-mail and post it for those employees without e-mail access at least a week before Election Day.

Be knowledgeable of the time off for voting laws in your state and make sure your organization’s policy matches up. Ensure all managers are following the policy consistently - if you’re flexible for one employee, extend the same flexibility to every employee.

Phillips has compiled a list of voting time off laws by state at The Word on Employment Law blog. For more information on the voting rules in your state, contact your state labor department.
Share/Bookmark

Drug-Free Work Week: Top 5 ways to participate

The third annual Drug-Free Work Week kicked off this week (October 20-26, 2008), to educate employers, employees, and the general public about the importance of being drug-free as a part of improving workplace safety and health.

Workplaces across the country are affected daily by drug use. Over two-thirds of alcohol and drug abusers in the U.S. were employed either full or part time in 2007, according to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings.

The Department of Labor created a list of activities employers can do during Drug-Free Work Week to promote a safer, healthier workplace through substance abuse prevention and intervention.

Here are our picks for the top 5 ways to get involved in Drug-Free Work Week:

Implement a Drug-Free Workplace Program if you don’t already have one. The DOL’s Working Partners Web site provides free tools and information to help you get started.

Promote your existing Drug-Free Workplace Program. Distribute your company policy to employees with an attached message promoting a healthy and safe workplace. Also include information where employees can ask questions, either privately or at an open discussion.

Train supervisors and educate workers. Train supervisors on the company’s policy regarding alcohol and drug use, how to identify potential problems and how to offer employees assistance. Hold training sessions for employees with guest speakers on how drugs affect workplace safety and health.

Allow employees to volunteer in community drug-prevention efforts. Show your organization’s dedication to a drug-free workplace by granting employees time off to volunteer in drug-prevention activities in the community.

Hold a special event promoting safety and health. Organize a social event in the office, complete with healthy snacks and sweets, that reinforces the importance of staying healthy and drug free.


Whether you celebrate Drug-Free Work Week this week or at a time more suitable to your business’ schedule, the important thing to remember is to encourage and educate employees how to stay drug-free, safe and healthy.

Visit the DOL’s Working Partners for more Drug-Free Work Week activities and more ways to promote a drug-free workplace.

How is your organization celebrating Drug-Free Work Week?
Share/Bookmark

Lacking anti-harassment policy, New Jersey employer liable

In a recent court decision, New Jersey employers may be held liable for negligence for an employee’s sexual harassment by a coworker if the business lacks effective anti-harassment policies, even if the employer was unaware of the situation.

The decision in Cerdeira v. Martindale-Hubbell is the first of it’s kind in New Jersey. The court’s ruling makes it fully clear that New Jersey employers can be liable for coworker sexual harassment in “the absence of an anti-harassment policy with effective preventative mechanisms.”

The state’s highest court advises employers wanting to avoid sexual harassment to put five elements in place:

  1. An anti-harassment policy
  2. A complaint structure that allows for formal and informal complaint procedures.
  3. Training that is offered to all members of the organization, but mandatory for supervisors and managers.
  4. Effective monitoring mechanisms, to determine whether the complaint structure is trusted.
  5. “An unequivocal commitment from the top that is not just in words but backed up by consistent practice.”

In 2007 there were 12,510 reported cases of sexual harassment resulting in almost $50 million in monetary benefits for charging parties (not including monetary benefits obtained through litigation), according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

“Prevention is the best tool to eliminate sexual harassment in the workplace,” according to the EEOC.

Visit G.Neil’s HR Library for more information on how to handle workplace diversity, discrimination and harassment.
Share/Bookmark

Retail giant sued for disability discrimination

Dillard’s, the nationwide department store chain, is facing a class action lawsuit for unlawfully requiring employees to disclose confidential medical information in order to qualify for excused sick leave or face disciplinary action including termination.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed charges under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against Dillard’s claiming their corporate policy is an unlawful disability-related inquiry under the ADA and not a justified business necessity.

In the lawsuit, the EEOC cites one instance where a sales associate was unable to attend work for a few days because of her medical illness. After submitting a doctor’s note justifying sick leave, Dillard’s asked her to reveal the specific nature of her illness for the absence to be deemed excused under company policy.

The sales associate refused to reveal the nature of her medical illness and informed Dillard’s that their requirements unlawfully invaded her right to privacy. Dillard’s considered the absences unexcused and fired the sales associate for refusing to disclose the requested medical information.

From an EEOC press release:

“This case has national implications and illustrates one of the reasons why the ADA prohibits employers from subjecting employees to disability-related inquiries not justified by business necessity,” said EEOC Regional Attorney Anna Park of the agency’s Los Angeles District. “The ADA’s prohibition of disability-related inquiries was enacted to protect employees from being subjected to harmful and unfounded stereotypes on the basis of a perceived or actual medical illness.”

San Diego Local Acting Director Raul Green said, “Employers need to be aware that the EEOC will vigorously enforce the ADA to ensure that employees are free to exercise their rights. Employees should not have to worry that this very sensitive, private and potentially harmful information will be used by the employer against them to unfairly exclude them from jobs that they could otherwise perform.”

Share/Bookmark

Improve teams, invest in talent with corporate training in a recession

Businesses are coping with the economic downturn in a number of ways from slashing budgets to downsizing. It is more important than ever to get the best return on investment in every aspect of your business.

Industry experts like George Colony, CEO of Forrester Research, advise companies to deal with the economic recession by investing in existing talent.

At a recent dinner Colony hosted for top CIOs, discussion on politics and the economy led to a list of recession strategies companies can use to successfully ride out an economic slowdown.

In a recap of the dinner on Colony’s blog, some of the best practices for a recession include:

  • Outsourcing is not a silver bullet. Use the recession to build internal skills.
  • Use a slowdown to improve the team -- look to bring in great people who have been laid off elsewhere.
  • Cut training and development last. That resource is critical to success in the post-recession period.


Instead of limiting the development of your team by cutting training programs, learn how to stretch your training dollar in a free webinar from Training Time - Squeezing the Most Out of Your Training Budget: Corporate Training in a Recession.

Training and development should remain a priority during tough times because:

  • Trained workers perform more efficiently with less errors and delays
  • Training boosts employee loyalty by encouraging career development
  • Employees taking on extra work quickly learn how to get up to speed with the right training
  • Training improves employee morale and confidence
  • Your best asset in business is a well-trained employee

Experienced training professionals will share tips and ideas to find better, more cost-effective training opportunities including the pros and cons of in-house versus outside training, the benefits of group versus individualized training, virtual training and tapping into expert talent within your company.

Good training doesn’t have to be expensive. Join us on Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 1 p.m. EST for the free webinar - Squeezing the Most Out of Your Training Budget: Corporate Training in a Recession. Space is limited, reserve your seat now.
Share/Bookmark

President signs mental health parity into law

A new law included in the economic bailout bill President Bush signed on Friday, will ensure more than one-third of Americans better insurance coverage for mental health treatments.

The mental health care benefits parity legislation will require health care plans to provide equal coverage of mental and physical illness. In the past, insurers were able to set higher co-payments and deductibles and harsh limits on treatment for mental illness and addiction disorders.

According to Workforce Management:

For example, plans no longer will be allowed to limit the number of annual outpatient visits for treatment of mental disorders while not imposing a comparable limit on the number of outpatient visits for other medical problems.

While the plan changes would be extensive, the cost impact is expected to be modest. The Congressional Budget Office last year estimated that enactment of a similar bill would boost health insurance premiums by an average of about 0.2 percent a year.


A result of 12 years of advocacy, the new law is described as “a milestone in the quest for civil rights, an effort to end insurance discrimination and to reduce the stigma of mental illness,” according to The New York Times.

The law will be effective for most health care plans on January 1, 2010. Businesses with 50 or fewer employees are exempt.


Related post:

Mental Health Parity Bill passes House, on to negotiations
Share/Bookmark

San Francisco court upholds universal health care plan

Earlier this week, federal judges ruled to uphold a health care ordinance giving San Francisco the right to make employers help pay part of the cost of the city’s universal health care plan.

“City officials and labor unions said the ruling establishes San Francisco as a model for state and local health coverage in the absence of a nationwide universal health plan,” according to the SFGate.


The city’s plan, called Healthy San Francisco, is the first of its kind in the nation and “could set the stage for a test of the supremacy of a longstanding federal labor law.”

Healthy San Francisco will help the city provide care for an estimated 73,000 uninsured residents, about 30,000 residents have already signed up.

Under the plan, companies with more than 20 employees that do not offer insurance to their workers must contribute $1.17 to $1.76 per employee per hour for health care.

Employers may choose to pay the money in a number of ways, including health care savings accounts, employer-provided insurance, employee reimbursement or contributing directly to Healthy San Francisco.


From The New York Times:

Mayor Gavin Newsom, a former restaurateur, said that his administration recognized that some extra expense was falling on businesses but that he was proud the city was a trailblazer.

“By thinking outside the box,” he said, “every city and state in this country can provide health care if they are willing to challenge the conventional wisdom.”

Some of San Francisco’s well-known restaurants have added small fees to bills, often with a note explaining that the charge goes to pay for health care.

Mr. Scherotter, who runs an Italian restaurant, adds such a fee. He said the law had added to his costs and his administrative workload. “It’s a lot of tedious arithmetic,” he said.

Share/Bookmark

When should HR know about an illness or disability?

A recent article from DiversityInc magazine examined issues regarding employee disabilities and illness, asking the question: When should employees tell their boss about a serious illness or disability?

Just last week the President secured protection for disabled workers by signing the ADA Amendments Act. Along with the Family and Medical Leave Act, you could assume that more employees would feel comfortable telling employers about their condition.

But even with protective legislation, the stigmas associated with an illness or disability can overshadow an employee’s training and work experience or may cause coworkers and supervisors to treat them differently.

The author suggests that it is best for an employee to disclose a serious illness or disability “as soon as practically possible” in that a company can only accommodate the employee if their condition is known.

We want to know your opinion:

When would HR managers prefer to know about an employee’s serious illness or disability? What is too soon, what is too late?

Does it impact promotion and raise decisions even if symptoms aren't showing yet? Is it really possible not to have it influence decisions?
Share/Bookmark

President signs ADA Amendments Act

As expected, President Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act on September 25, 2008. The Act supersedes several Supreme Court decisions that unfairly limited protections under the ADA.

"This is a monumental victory for people with disabilities. As America seeks to respond to the economic challenges we face, this law -- if enforced -- will assure that people with disabilities are fairly included in the workforce and that we can do our jobs free from discrimination,” said Jim Ward, ADA Watch/National Coalition for Disability Rights founder and president.


Set to take effect January 1, 2009, the Act clarifies the definition of “disability” in that a person may be disabled even though they may use medication, prosthetics and assistive technology to alleviate their disability.

Please stay tuned to G.Neil’s HR Forum for the latest news on how the new disabilities legislation may affect your business.


Related posts:

Legal update: House passes ADA Amendments Act, President will sign “soon”

Senate passes ADA Amendments Act, House and President approval expected

Target $6 million settlement: Is your site ADA compliant?

Disabilities rights bill on the move
Share/Bookmark

Why DO businesses pay for things that are free from the government?

As Veritas points out, the government provides most forms and postings to businesses at no cost, and most business people understand that this is available. Which raises the question: “Why do businesses pay for government forms and other compliance materials that are available for free from the government?”

The answer we hear from customers involves their definition of “free.” They place a high value on their work time and have more pressing business matters to address. They recognize that accessing the appropriate compliance materials, interpreting their purpose and requirements, monitoring them for frequent changes, and downloading and printing documents on their own is often less cost-efficient than relying on labor law experts such as G.Neil to provide these services. As an added value, we also provide tools and resources that make executing your documentation easier and error-free.

Also, there is no single government-supplied resource that provides everything a business needs to maintain compliance. And even more concerning, is the fact that government agencies and regulators have no obligation to advise businesses when requirements change. So while the Department of Labor does provide downloadable posters on their website, this government agency is only one of the more than 150 different agencies that issue and frequently update more than 500 different mandatory labor law postings. This makes a “do-it-yourself” philosophy for maintaining compliance higher risk and more time-consuming than many realize.

Of course, I can make these statements as a provider of such compliance tools, but our customers can speak for themselves.

Anybody else have an answer for the question: “Why do businesses pay for government forms and other compliance materials that are available for free from the government?”

Susan Drenning

President, G.Neil


Share/Bookmark

USERRA helps veterans get back to work

Earlier this month, the President announced the withdrawal of 8,000 troops from Iraq by next February and the deployment of others to Afghanistan.

With 8,000 troops expected to return to the U.S. by next year, employers need to be prepared and understand the details of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA). 

USERRA provides reemployment protection and other benefits for veterans and other employees who perform military service. The law applies to all employers, regardless of size and all service members, including those who volunteered to serve.

"Service members transitioning from the military today are some of the most educated, technically savvy, professionally qualified the armed forces have ever produced," says Willie Hensley, deputy assistant secretary for human resources management and labor relations for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.


Many service members have received expert training in areas such as engineering, health care, information technology and security. Even with their qualifications, helping service members transition back into the workplace can be a difficult process.

For employers looking to hire veterans and advice for transitioning soldiers, visit sites including:



For more information on how USERRA protects the employment and benefit rights for employees who serve in the military and your responsibilities for accommodating disabled veterans visit GNeil.com and take a look at our E-Guide: When Soldiers Return to Work.
Share/Bookmark
 

Labels :

Copyright (c) 2010. Blogger templates by Bloggermint